↓ Skip to main content

Neuronal circuits and physiological roles of the basal ganglia in terms of transmitters, receptors and related disorders

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Physiological Sciences, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 321)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Neuronal circuits and physiological roles of the basal ganglia in terms of transmitters, receptors and related disorders
Published in
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12576-016-0445-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katsuya Yamada, Susumu Takahashi, Fuyuki Karube, Fumino Fujiyama, Kazuto Kobayashi, Akinori Nishi, Toshihiko Momiyama

Abstract

The authors have reviewed recent research advances in basal ganglia circuitry and function, as well as in related disorders from multidisciplinary perspectives derived from the results of morphological, electrophysiological, behavioral, biochemical and molecular biological studies. Based on their expertise in their respective fields, as denoted in the text, the authors discuss five distinct research topics, as follows: (1) area-specific dopamine receptor expression of astrocytes in basal ganglia, (2) the role of physiologically released dopamine in the striatum, (3) control of behavioral flexibility by striatal cholinergic interneurons, (4) regulation of phosphorylation states of DARPP-32 by protein phosphatases and (5) physiological perspective on deep brain stimulation with optogenetics and closed-loop control for ameliorating parkinsonism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,295,051
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#27
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,231
of 303,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.