↓ Skip to main content

The decision tool unipolar depression (DTUD): a new measure to facilitate the early identification of patients with major depressive disorder in need of highly specialized care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
The decision tool unipolar depression (DTUD): a new measure to facilitate the early identification of patients with major depressive disorder in need of highly specialized care
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2165-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frédérique C. W. van Krugten, Maartje Goorden, Anton J. L. M. van Balkom, Patricia van Oppen, Henricus G. Ruhé, Digna J. F. van Schaik, Werner B. F. Brouwer, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,047,580
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,290
of 4,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,363
of 353,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#63
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.