↓ Skip to main content

Tool-use in the brown bear (Ursus arctos)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
Tool-use in the brown bear (Ursus arctos)
Published in
Animal Cognition, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10071-012-0475-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Volker B. Deecke

Abstract

This is the first report of tool-using behaviour in a wild brown bear (Ursus arctos). Whereas the use of tools is comparatively common among primates and has also been documented in several species of birds, fishes and invertebrates, tool-using behaviours have so far been observed in only four species of non-primate mammal. The observation was made and photographed while studying the behaviour of a subadult brown bear in south-eastern Alaska. The animal repeatedly picked up barnacle-encrusted rocks in shallow water, manipulated and re-oriented them in its forepaws, and used them to rub its neck and muzzle. The behaviour probably served to relieve irritated skin or to remove food-remains from the fur. Bears habitually rub against stationary objects and overturn rocks and boulders during foraging and such rubbing behaviour could have been transferred to a freely movable object to classify as tool-use. The bear exhibited considerable motor skills when manipulating the rocks, which clearly shows that these animals possess the advanced motor learning necessary for tool-use. Advanced spatial cognition and motor skills for object manipulation during feeding and tool-use provide a possible explanation for why bears have the largest brains relative to body size of all carnivores. Systematic research into the cognitive abilities of bears, both in captivity and in the wild, is clearly warranted to fully understand their motor-learning skills and physical intelligence related to tool-use and other object manipulation tasks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 3 1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 184 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 16%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 55%
Environmental Science 22 10%
Psychology 20 10%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 29 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#464,550
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#124
of 1,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,995
of 168,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.