| Title |
Factors influencing decisions by critical care physicians to withdraw life-sustaining treatments in critically ill adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.190154 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexis F Turgeon, Kristin Dorrance, Patrick Archambault, François Lauzier, François Lamontagne, Ryan Zarychanski, Robert Fowler, Lynne Moore, Jacques Lacroix, Shane English, Amélie Boutin, John Muscedere, Karen E A Burns, Donald Griesdale, Lauralyn A McIntyre, Damon Scales, Francis Bernard, Janet Yamada, Janet E Squires |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 17 | 59% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Serbia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 66% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#452,068
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#785
of 9,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,001
of 331,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#27
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.