| Title |
Incidence and outcome of invasive candidiasis in intensive care units (ICUs) in Europe: results of the EUCANDICU project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2497-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Bassetti, Daniele R. Giacobbe, Antonio Vena, Cecilia Trucchi, Filippo Ansaldi, Massimo Antonelli, Vaclava Adamkova, Cristiano Alicino, Maria-Panagiota Almyroudi, Enora Atchade, Anna M. Azzini, Novella Carannante, Alessia Carnelutti, Silvia Corcione, Andrea Cortegiani, George Dimopoulos, Simon Dubler, José L. García-Garmendia, Massimo Girardis, Oliver A. Cornely, Stefano Ianniruberto, Bart Jan Kullberg, Katrien Lagrou, Clement Le Bihan, Roberto Luzzati, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain, Maria Merelli, Ana J. Marques, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Alessio Mesini, José-Artur Paiva, Maddalena Peghin, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, Jeroen Schouten, Pierluigi Brugnaro, Herbert Spapen, Polychronis Tasioudis, Jean-François Timsit, Valentino Tisa, Mario Tumbarello, Charlotte H. S. B. van den Berg, Benoit Veber, Mario Venditti, Guillaume Voiriot, Joost Wauters, Philippe Montravers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Russia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 50 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 35% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 63 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,485,686
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,171
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,938
of 367,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#56
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.