Title |
Changing Arctic snow cover: A review of recent developments and assessment of future needs for observations, modelling, and impacts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ambio, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13280-016-0770-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stef Bokhorst, Stine Højlund Pedersen, Ludovic Brucker, Oleg Anisimov, Jarle W. Bjerke, Ross D. Brown, Dorothee Ehrich, Richard L. H. Essery, Achim Heilig, Susanne Ingvander, Cecilia Johansson, Margareta Johansson, Ingibjörg Svala Jónsdóttir, Niila Inga, Kari Luojus, Giovanni Macelloni, Heather Mariash, Donald McLennan, Gunhild Ninis Rosqvist, Atsushi Sato, Hannele Savela, Martin Schneebeli, Aleksandr Sokolov, Sergey A. Sokratov, Silvia Terzago, Dagrun Vikhamar-Schuler, Scott Williamson, Yubao Qiu, Terry V. Callaghan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 379 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 23% |
Researcher | 59 | 15% |
Student > Master | 50 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
Professor | 12 | 3% |
Other | 46 | 12% |
Unknown | 95 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 93 | 24% |
Environmental Science | 77 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 10% |
Engineering | 19 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
Other | 30 | 8% |
Unknown | 113 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,505,682
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#454
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,260
of 331,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.