↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy induction by SIRT6 is involved in oxidative stress-induced neuronal damage

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Autophagy induction by SIRT6 is involved in oxidative stress-induced neuronal damage
Published in
Protein & Cell, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13238-016-0257-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaxiang Shao, Xiao Yang, Tengyuan Liu, Tingting Zhang, Qian Reuben Xie, Weiliang Xia

Abstract

SIRT6 is a NAD(+)-dependent histone deacetylase and has been implicated in the regulation of genomic stability, DNA repair, metabolic homeostasis and several diseases. The effect of SIRT6 in cerebral ischemia and oxygen/glucose deprivation (OGD) has been reported, however the role of SIRT6 in oxidative stress damage remains unclear. Here we used SH-SY5Y neuronal cells and found that overexpression of SIRT6 led to decreased cell viability and increased necrotic cell death and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production under oxidative stress. Mechanistic study revealed that SIRT6 induced autophagy via attenuation of AKT signaling and treatment with autophagy inhibitor 3-MA or knockdown of autophagy-related protein Atg5 rescued H2O2-induced neuronal injury. Conversely, SIRT6 inhibition suppressed autophagy and reduced oxidative stress-induced neuronal damage. These results suggest that SIRT6 might be a potential therapeutic target for neuroprotection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 33%
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,171,921
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#210
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,096
of 305,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.