You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: descriptive characteristics of the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-019-4906-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert W. Koivula, Ian M. Forgie, Azra Kurbasic, Ana Viñuela, Alison Heggie, Giuseppe N. Giordano, Tue H. Hansen, Michelle Hudson, Anitra D. M. Koopman, Femke Rutters, Maritta Siloaho, Kristine H. Allin, Søren Brage, Caroline A. Brorsson, Adem Y. Dawed, Federico De Masi, Christopher J. Groves, Tarja Kokkola, Anubha Mahajan, Mandy H. Perry, Simone P. Rauh, Martin Ridderstråle, Harriet J. A. Teare, E. Louise Thomas, Andrea Tura, Henrik Vestergaard, Tom White, Jerzy Adamski, Jimmy D. Bell, Joline W. Beulens, Søren Brunak, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis, Philippe Froguel, Gary Frost, Ramneek Gupta, Torben Hansen, Andrew Hattersley, Bernd Jablonka, Jane Kaye, Markku Laakso, Timothy J. McDonald, Oluf Pedersen, Jochen M. Schwenk, Imre Pavo, Andrea Mari, Mark I. McCarthy, Hartmut Ruetten, Mark Walker, Ewan Pearson, Paul W. Franks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 41% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,215,442
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,563
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,341
of 370,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#36
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.