↓ Skip to main content

Blending of brain-machine interface and vision-guided autonomous robotics improves neuroprosthetic arm performance during grasping

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Blending of brain-machine interface and vision-guided autonomous robotics improves neuroprosthetic arm performance during grasping
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12984-016-0134-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

John E. Downey, Jeffrey M. Weiss, Katharina Muelling, Arun Venkatraman, Jean-Sebastien Valois, Martial Hebert, J. Andrew Bagnell, Andrew B. Schwartz, Jennifer L. Collinger

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) offer great potential for restoring upper limb function. However, grasping objects is a complicated task and the signals extracted from the brain may not always be capable of driving these movements reliably. Vision-guided robotic assistance is one possible way to improve BMI performance. We describe a method of shared control where the user controls a prosthetic arm using a BMI and receives assistance with positioning the hand when it approaches an object. Two human subjects with tetraplegia used a robotic arm to complete object transport tasks with and without shared control. The shared control system was designed to provide a balance between BMI-derived intention and computer assistance. An autonomous robotic grasping system identified and tracked objects and defined stable grasp positions for these objects. The system identified when the user intended to interact with an object based on the BMI-controlled movements of the robotic arm. Using shared control, BMI controlled movements and autonomous grasping commands were blended to ensure secure grasps. Both subjects were more successful on object transfer tasks when using shared control compared to BMI control alone. Movements made using shared control were more accurate, more efficient, and less difficult. One participant attempted a task with multiple objects and successfully lifted one of two closely spaced objects in 92 % of trials, demonstrating the potential for users to accurately execute their intention while using shared control. Integration of BMI control with vision-guided robotic assistance led to improved performance on object transfer tasks. Providing assistance while maintaining generalizability will make BMI systems more attractive to potential users. NCT01364480 and NCT01894802 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 259 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 22%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 61 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 81 31%
Neuroscience 34 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Computer Science 10 4%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 69 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,116,088
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#167
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,123
of 300,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.