↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant thiamine improved standard treatment in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Adjuvant thiamine improved standard treatment in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00406-016-0685-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Ghaleiha, Hassan Davari, Leila Jahangard, Mohammad Haghighi, Mohammad Ahmadpanah, Mohammad Ali Seifrabie, Hafez Bajoghli, Edith Holsboer-Trachsler, Serge Brand

Abstract

Given that antidepressants (ADs) work slowly, there is interest in means to accelerate their therapeutic effect and to reduce side effects. In this regard, thiamine (vitamin B1) is attracting growing interest. Thiamine is an essential nutrient, while thiamine deficiency leads to a broad variety of disorders including irritability and symptoms of depression. Here, we tested the hypothesis that adjuvant thiamine would reduce depression, compared to placebo. A total of 51 inpatients (mean age: 35.2 years; 53 % females) with MDD (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score (HDRS) at baseline: >24) took part in the study. A standardized treatment with SSRI was introduced and kept at therapeutic levels throughout the study. Patients were randomly assigned either to the thiamine or the placebo condition. Experts rated (HDRS) symptoms of depression at baseline, and after 3, 6, and 12 weeks (end of the study). Between baseline and the end of the study, depression had reduced in both groups. Compared to placebo, adjuvant thiamine improved symptoms of depression after 6 week of treatment, and improvements remained fairly stable until the end of the study, though mean differences at week 12 were not statistically significant anymore. No adverse side effects were reported in either group. Results suggest that among younger patients with MDD adjuvant thiamine alleviated symptoms of depression faster compared to placebo. Importantly, improvements were observed within 6 weeks of initiation of treatment. Thus, thiamine might have the potential to counteract the time lag in the antidepressant effects of ADs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 37 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Psychology 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 43 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,521,285
of 25,255,356 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#84
of 1,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,726
of 306,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,255,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.