↓ Skip to main content

Altering lamina assembly reveals lamina-dependent and -independent functions for A-type lamins

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Science, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Altering lamina assembly reveals lamina-dependent and -independent functions for A-type lamins
Published in
Journal of Cell Science, January 2015
DOI 10.1242/jcs.171843
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lamins are intermediate filament proteins forming a fibrous meshwork, called nuclear lamina, between the inner nuclear membrane and peripheral heterochromatin of metazoan cells. The assembly and incorporation of lamin A/C into the lamina as well as their various functions are still not well understood. Here, we employed designed ankyrin repeat proteins (DARPins) as novel experimental tools for lamin research. We screened for DARPins that specifically bind lamin A/C, interfere with lamin assembly in vitro, and with incorporation of lamin A/C into the native lamina in living cells. Selected DARPins inhibit lamin assembly and delocalize A-type lamins to the nucleoplasm without modifying lamin expression levels or amino acid sequence. Using these lamin binders we demonstrate the importance of proper integration of lamin A/C into the lamina for nuclear mechanical properties and nuclear envelope integrity. Finally, our study provides evidence for cell-type specific differences in lamin functions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 29%
Engineering 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Science
#6,964
of 9,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,894
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Science
#127
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.