↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein in Neurology

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Neurology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
475 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein in Neurology
Published in
JAMA Neurology, September 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1534
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Bridel, Wessel N. van Wieringen, Henrik Zetterberg, Betty M. Tijms, Charlotte E. Teunissen, José C. Alvarez-Cermeño, Ulf Andreasson, Markus Axelsson, David C. Bäckström, Ales Bartos, Maria Bjerke, Kaj Blennow, Adam Boxer, Lou Brundin, Joachim Burman, Tove Christensen, Lenká Fialová, Lars Forsgren, Jette L. Frederiksen, Magnus Gisslén, Elizabeth Gray, Martin Gunnarsson, Sara Hall, Oskar Hansson, Megan K. Herbert, Joel Jakobsson, Jan Jessen-Krut, Shorena Janelidze, Gudmundur Johannsson, Michael Jonsson, Ludwig Kappos, Mohsen Khademi, Michael Khalil, Jens Kuhle, Mikael Landén, Ville Leinonen, Giancarlo Logroscino, Ching-Hua Lu, Jan Lycke, Nadia K. Magdalinou, Andrea Malaspina, Niklas Mattsson, Lieke H. Meeter, Sanjay R. Mehta, Signe Modvig, Tomas Olsson, Ross W. Paterson, Josué Pérez-Santiago, Fredrik Piehl, Yolande A. L. Pijnenburg, Okko T. Pyykkö, Oskar Ragnarsson, Julio C. Rojas, Jeppe Romme Christensen, Linda Sandberg, Carole S. Scherling, Jonathan M. Schott, Finn T. Sellebjerg, Isabella L. Simone, Tobias Skillbäck, Morten Stilund, Peter Sundström, Anders Svenningsson, Rosanna Tortelli, Carla Tortorella, Alessandro Trentini, Maria Troiano, Martin R. Turner, John C. van Swieten, Mattias Vågberg, Marcel M. Verbeek, Luisa M. Villar, Pieter Jelle Visser, Anders Wallin, Andreas Weiss, Carsten Wikkelsø, Edward J. Wild

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 485 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 11%
Other 41 8%
Student > Master 38 8%
Student > Bachelor 36 7%
Other 88 18%
Unknown 155 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 100 21%
Neuroscience 84 17%
Psychology 15 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 194 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2021.
All research outputs
#360,453
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#474
of 5,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,336
of 355,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#14
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.