↓ Skip to main content

Risk of human toxocarosis in Poland due to Toxocara infection of dogs and cats

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Parasitologica, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Risk of human toxocarosis in Poland due to Toxocara infection of dogs and cats
Published in
Acta Parasitologica, December 2014
DOI 10.1515/ap-2015-0012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jakub Gawor, Anna Borecka, Magdalena Marczyńska, Sabina Dobosz, Hanna Żarnowska-Prymek

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to present the current data on the risk of toxocarosis in humans in Poland and to give an overview of the clinical and diagnostic aspects of the disease. The number of reported clinical cases of Toxocara infection in children in Poland in medical literature has increased recently. The results of field surveys aimed to evaluate the soil contamination with geohelminth eggs conducted during the last few years showed that Toxocara is the most common zoonotic agent in urban public sites and in rural settlements. The questionnaire revealed rural inhabitants' low awareness of zoonotic parasite threats to humans. In particular parents should be advised as to what proper preventive measures to undertake to eliminate the toxocarosis risk factors for children in rural environment. Prevention of initial environment contamination with Toxocara canis and T. cati eggs, which includes proper treatment regimes to eliminate patent infections in dogs and cats and preventing pets from defecating in public areas and private households is vital. To provide the public with suitably presented information as well as pet owners with uniform recommendations, a close collaboration between veterinary and public health professionals is crucial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Unspecified 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Unspecified 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Parasitologica
#481
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,591
of 359,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Parasitologica
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.