| Title |
Use of multiple inflammatory marker tests in primary care: using Clinical Practice Research Datalink to evaluate accuracy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x704309 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Watson, Hayley E Jones, Jonathan Banks, Penny Whiting, Chris Salisbury, Willie Hamilton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 61 | 56% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 19% |
| Scientists | 16 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#292,902
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#99
of 4,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,882
of 367,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.