↓ Skip to main content

Boredom, sustained attention and the default mode network

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Boredom, sustained attention and the default mode network
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00221-016-4617-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Danckert, Colleen Merrifield

Abstract

Boredom is a ubiquitous human experience that can best be described as an inability to engage with one's environment despite the motivation to do so. Boredom is perceived as a negative experience and demonstrates strong associations with other negatively valenced states including depression and aggression. Although boredom has been shown to be elevated in neurological and psychiatric illnesses, little is known about the neural underpinnings of the state. We scanned the brains of healthy participants under four separate conditions: a resting state scan, a sustained attention task and two video-based mood inductions, one known to produce boredom and another we validated to produce a state of interest or engagement. Using independent components analyses, results showed common regions of correlated activation in posterior regions of the so-called default mode network (DMN) of the brain across all four conditions. The sustained attention and boredom induction scans were differentiated from the resting state scan by the presence of anticorrelated activity-i.e. when DMN regions were active, this region was deactivated-in the anterior insula cortex. This same region demonstrated correlated activity with both the DMN and the regions associated with attentional control during the interest mood induction. We interpret these findings to suggest that boredom represents a failure to engage executive control networks when faced with a monotonous task-in other words, when the task demands some level of engagement (watch the movie, search for infrequent targets), but is so mundane that attempts to do so fail.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 217 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 19%
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 51 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 31%
Neuroscience 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 61 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,155,849
of 24,468,058 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#67
of 3,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,965
of 304,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,468,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.