↓ Skip to main content

Natural product coumarins: biological and pharmacological perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Natural product coumarins: biological and pharmacological perspectives
Published in
Biologia, April 2019
DOI 10.2478/s11756-019-00242-x
Authors

M. Iftikhar Hussain, Qamar Abbas Syed, Muhammad Nasir Khan Khattak, Baraa Hafez, Manuel J. Reigosa, Ali El-Keblawy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 49 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 57 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,405,385
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#239
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,244
of 355,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.