↓ Skip to main content

A Meta-analysis of Attachment to Parents and Delinquency

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
19 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
463 Mendeley
Title
A Meta-analysis of Attachment to Parents and Delinquency
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10802-011-9608-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Machteld Hoeve, Geert Jan J. M. Stams, Claudia E. van der Put, Judith Semon Dubas, Peter H. van der Laan, Jan R. M. Gerris

Abstract

To investigate the link between attachment to parents and delinquency, and the potential moderating effects of age and sex, 74 published and unpublished manuscripts (N = 55,537 participants) were subjected to a multilevel meta-analysis. A mean small to moderate effect size was found (r = 0.18). Poor attachment to parents was significantly linked to delinquency in boys and girls. Stronger effect sizes were found for attachment to mothers than attachment to fathers. In addition, stronger effect sizes were found if the child and the parent had the same sex compared to cross-sex pairs of children and parents. Age of the participants moderated the link between attachment and delinquency: larger effect sizes were found in younger than in older participants. It can be concluded that attachment is associated with juvenile delinquency. Attachment could therefore be a target for intervention to reduce or prevent future delinquent behavior in juveniles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 455 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 16%
Student > Bachelor 73 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 7%
Researcher 32 7%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 121 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 195 42%
Social Sciences 56 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 2%
Arts and Humanities 8 2%
Other 33 7%
Unknown 141 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#994,634
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#72
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,022
of 252,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.