↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Patient Preferences in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Patient Preferences in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
DOI 10.2165/11314840-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

John E. Brazier, Simon Dixon, Julie Ratcliffe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 5%
Canada 3 4%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#996
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,724
of 286,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#99
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.