↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid Graphene and Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanocomposite: Gap Opening, Electron–Hole Puddle, Interfacial Charge Transfer, and Enhanced Visible Light Response

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
561 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hybrid Graphene and Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanocomposite: Gap Opening, Electron–Hole Puddle, Interfacial Charge Transfer, and Enhanced Visible Light Response
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, February 2012
DOI 10.1021/ja211637p
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aijun Du, Stefano Sanvito, Zhen Li, Dawei Wang, Yan Jiao, Ting Liao, Qiao Sun, Yun Hau Ng, Zhonghua Zhu, Rose Amal, Sean C. Smith

Abstract

Opening up a band gap and finding a suitable substrate material are two big challenges for building graphene-based nanodevices. Using state-of-the-art hybrid density functional theory incorporating long-range dispersion corrections, we investigate the interface between optically active graphitic carbon nitride (g-C(3)N(4)) and electronically active graphene. We find an inhomogeneous planar substrate (g-C(3)N(4)) promotes electron-rich and hole-rich regions, i.e., forming a well-defined electron-hole puddle, on the supported graphene layer. The composite displays significant charge transfer from graphene to the g-C(3)N(4) substrate, which alters the electronic properties of both components. In particular, the strong electronic coupling at the graphene/g-C(3)N(4) interface opens a 70 meV gap in g-C(3)N(4)-supported graphene, a feature that can potentially allow overcoming the graphene's band gap hurdle in constructing field effect transistors. Additionally, the 2-D planar structure of g-C(3)N(4) is free of dangling bonds, providing an ideal substrate for graphene to sit on. Furthermore, when compared to a pure g-C(3)N(4) monolayer, the hybrid graphene/g-C(3)N(4) complex displays an enhanced optical absorption in the visible region, a promising feature for novel photovoltaic and photocatalytic applications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 3 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 251 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 26%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 50 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 85 33%
Materials Science 43 16%
Physics and Astronomy 30 11%
Chemical Engineering 17 7%
Engineering 12 5%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 59 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2012.
All research outputs
#3,876,952
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#13,695
of 61,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,897
of 155,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#165
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.