↓ Skip to main content

Scientific characterisation of the dyes, pigments, fibres and wood used in the production of barkcloth from Pacific islands

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Scientific characterisation of the dyes, pigments, fibres and wood used in the production of barkcloth from Pacific islands
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12520-018-0745-0
Authors

Diego Tamburini, Caroline R. Cartwright, Marta Melchiorre Di Crescenzo, Georgina Rayner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 15%
Engineering 3 11%
Materials Science 3 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,962,438
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#500
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,773
of 345,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.