↓ Skip to main content

Are algal genes in nonphotosynthetic protists evidence of historical plastid endosymbioses?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Are algal genes in nonphotosynthetic protists evidence of historical plastid endosymbioses?
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-10-484
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W Stiller, Jinling Huang, Qin Ding, Jing Tian, Carol Goodwillie

Abstract

How photosynthetic organelles, or plastids, were acquired by diverse eukaryotes is among the most hotly debated topics in broad scale eukaryotic evolution. The history of plastid endosymbioses commonly is interpreted under the "chromalveolate" hypothesis, which requires numerous plastid losses from certain heterotrophic groups that now are entirely aplastidic. In this context, discoveries of putatively algal genes in plastid-lacking protists have been cited as evidence of gene transfer from a photosynthetic endosymbiont that subsequently was lost completely. Here we examine this evidence, as it pertains to the chromalveolate hypothesis, through genome-level statistical analyses of similarity scores from queries with two diatoms, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana, and two aplastidic sister taxa, Phytophthora ramorum and P. sojae.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
France 2 3%
Czechia 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 7 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,704
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,184
of 107,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#19
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.