| Title |
CMR in the Evaluation of Diastolic Dysfunction and Phenotyping of HFpEF Current Role and Future Perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammed A Chamsi-Pasha, Yang Zhan, Dany Debs, Dipan J Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 10% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Mexico | 4 | 4% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 22% |
| Scientists | 16 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 55% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#750,580
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#197
of 2,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,360
of 369,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#8
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.