You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31131-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Widmark, Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Lars Beckman, Camilla Thellenberg-Karlsson, Morten Hoyer, Magnus Lagerlund, Jon Kindblom, Claes Ginman, Bengt Johansson, Kirsten Björnlinger, Mihajl Seke, Måns Agrup, Per Fransson, Björn Tavelin, David Norman, Björn Zackrisson, Harald Anderson, Elisabeth Kjellén, Lars Franzén, Per Nilsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 213 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 55 | 26% |
| Spain | 14 | 7% |
| France | 11 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 5% |
| Australia | 7 | 3% |
| Mexico | 6 | 3% |
| Belgium | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 58 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 135 | 63% |
| Scientists | 49 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 416 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 416 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 16% |
| Other | 54 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Unknown | 130 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 177 | 43% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 16 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 43 | 10% |
| Unknown | 159 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 228. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#171,463
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,085
of 43,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,267
of 368,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#38
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.