Title |
No evidence for decreased incidence of aspiration after rapid sequence induction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, September 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf03026872 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David T. Neilipovitz, Edward T. Crosby |
Abstract |
The purpose of this structured, evidence-based, clinical update was to determine if rapid sequence induction is a safe or effective technique to decrease the risk of aspiration or other complications of airway management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
South Africa | 2 | 1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 126 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 31 | 23% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 41 | 30% |
Unknown | 13 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 79% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 15 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,664,348
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#200
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,175
of 81,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them