↓ Skip to main content

IFSO-APC Consensus Statements 2011

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
IFSO-APC Consensus Statements 2011
Published in
Obesity Surgery, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11695-012-0610-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazunori Kasama, Wilfred Mui, Wei Jei Lee, Muffazal Lakdawala, Takeshi Naitoh, Yosuke Seki, Akira Sasaki, Go Wakabayashi, Iwao Sasaki, Isao Kawamura, Lilian Kow, Harry Frydenberg, Anton Chen, Mahendra Narwaria, Pradeep Chowbey

Abstract

Associations of BMI with body composition and health outcomes may differ between Asian and European populations. Asian populations have also been shown to have an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia at a relatively low level of BMI. New surgical indication for Asian patients should be discussed by the expert of this field. Forty-four bariatric experts in Asia-Pacific and other regions were chosen to have a voting privilege for IFSO-APC Consensus at the 2nd IFSO-APC Congress. A computerized audience-response voting system was used to analyze the agreement with the sentence of the consensus. Of all delegates, 95% agreed with the necessity of the establishment of IFSO-APC consensus statements, and 98% agreed with the necessity of a new indication for Asian patients. IFSO-APC Consensus statements 2011. Bariatric surgery should be considered for the treatment of obesity for acceptable Asian candidates with BMI ≥ 35 with or without co-morbidities. Bariatric/GI metabolic surgery should be considered for the treatment of T2DM or metabolic syndrome for patients who are inadequately controlled by lifestyle alternations and medical treatment for acceptable Asian candidates with BMI ≥ 30. The surgical approach may be considered as a non-primary alternative to treat inadequately controlled T2DM, or metabolic syndrome, for suitable Asian candidates with BMI ≥ 27.5. Other eight sentences are agreed with by majority of the voting delegates to form IFSO-APC consensus statements. This will help to make safe and wholesome the progress of bariatric and metabolic surgery in Asia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Other 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,058
of 3,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,665
of 155,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#19
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.