You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘Soft power is such a benign animal’: narrative power and the reification of concepts in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/09557571.2019.1623171 |
| Authors |
Stephanie Christine Winkler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 8 | 47% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 6% |
| Antarctica | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 7 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 24 | 37% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,751,367
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#100
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,419
of 352,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cambridge Review of International Affairs
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.