↓ Skip to main content

Pedophilia: A Diagnosis in Search of a Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Pedophilia: A Diagnosis in Search of a Disorder
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-9919-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agustin Malón

Abstract

This article presents a critical review of the recent controversies concerning the diagnosis of pedophilia in the context of the preparation of the fifth edition of the DSM. The analysis focuses basically on the relationship between pedophilia and the current DSM-IV-TR's definition of mental disorder. Scholars appear not to share numerous basic assumptions ranging from their underlying ideas about what constitutes a mental disorder to the role of psychiatry in modern society, including irreconcilable theories about human sexuality, which interfere with reaching any kind of a consensus as to what the psychiatric status of pedophilia should be. It is questioned if the diagnosis of pedophilia contained in the DSM is more forensic than therapeutic, focusing rather on the dangers inherent in the condition of pedophilia (dangerous dysfunction) than on its negative effects for the subject (harmful dysfunction). The apparent necessity of the diagnosis of pedophilia in the DSM is supported, but the basis for this diagnosis is uncertain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 25%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 42%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Arts and Humanities 5 6%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,969,413
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,038
of 3,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,085
of 168,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#22
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.