| Title |
A reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay for detecting the pathogen of maize rough dwarf disease in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australasian Plant Pathology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13313-019-00649-9 |
| Authors |
Linlin Du, Wenjuan Shi, Xuejuan Li, Ying Lan, Feng Sun, Yongjian Fan, Tong Zhou, Yijun Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,023,618
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Plant Pathology
#312
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,043
of 353,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Plant Pathology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.