| Title |
Isolation, identification and genomic characterization of the Asian lineage Zika virus imported to China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Life Sciences, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11427-016-5043-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong-Qiang Deng, Hui Zhao, Xiao-Feng Li, Na-Na Zhang, Zhong-Yu Liu, Tao Jiang, Da-Yong Gu, Lei Shi, Jian-An He, Hong-Jiang Wang, Zhao-Zeng Sun, Qing Ye, Dong-Yang Xie, Wu-Chun Cao, Cheng-Feng Qin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,963,412
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#96
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,091
of 300,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.