You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
福島の甲状腺がんの過剰診断―なぜ発生し,なぜ拡大したか―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.11447/sraj.28.67 |
| Authors |
高野 徹 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 194 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 69 | 36% |
| Comoros | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 188 | 97% |
| Scientists | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#317,073
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
#1
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,863
of 365,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them