↓ Skip to main content

Caries-preventive effect of anti-erosive and nano-hydroxyapatite-containing toothpastes in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Caries-preventive effect of anti-erosive and nano-hydroxyapatite-containing toothpastes in vitro
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00784-016-1789-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Esteves-Oliveira, N. M. Santos, H. Meyer-Lueckel, R. J. Wierichs, J. A. Rodrigues

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the caries-preventive effect of newly developed fluoride and fluoride-free toothpastes specially designed for erosion prevention. The hypothesis was that these products might also show superior caries-inhibiting effect than regular fluoride toothpastes, since they were designed for stronger erosive acid challenges. Enamel specimens were obtained from bovine teeth and pre-demineralized (pH = 4.95/21 days) to create artificial caries lesions. Baseline mineral loss (ΔZB) and lesion depth (LDB) were determined using transversal microradiography (TMR). Ninety specimens with a median ΔZB (SD) of 6027 ± 1546 vol% × μm were selected and randomly allocated to five groups (n = 18). Treatments during pH-cycling (14 days, 4 × 60 min demineralization/day) were brushing 2×/day with AmF (1400 ppm F(-), anti-caries [AC]); AmF/NaF/SnCl2/Chitosan (700 ppm F(-)/700 ppm F(-)/3500 ppm Sn(2+), anti-erosion [AE1]); NaF/KNO3 (1400 ppm F(-), anti-erosion [AE2]); nano-hydroxyapatite-containing (0 ppm F(-), [nHA]); and fluoride-free toothpastes (0 ppm F(-), negative control [NC]). Toothpaste slurries were prepared with mineral salt solution (1:3 wt/wt). After pH-cycling specimens presenting lesion, surface loss (mainly by NC and nHA) were discarded. For the remaining 77 specimens, new TMR analyses (ΔZE/LDE) were performed. Changes in mineral loss (ΔΔZ = ΔZB - ΔZE) and lesion depth (ΔLD = LDB - LDE) were calculated. All toothpastes caused significantly less demineralization (lower ΔΔZ) than NC (p < 0.05, ANOVA) except for nHA. The fluoride toothpastes did not differ significantly regarding ΔΔZ and ΔLD (p > 0.05, ANOVA). While both anti-erosive and anti-caries toothpastes reduced mineral loss to a similar extent, the fluoride-free nano-hydroxyapatite-containing toothpaste seemed not to be suitable for inhibition of caries demineralization in vitro.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Latvia 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 29 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 37%
Chemistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,678,856
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#104
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,430
of 299,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.