↓ Skip to main content

Sample size calculations in clinical research should also be based on ethical principles

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sample size calculations in clinical research should also be based on ethical principles
Published in
Trials, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1277-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Mario Cesana, Paolo Antonelli

Abstract

Sample size calculations based on too narrow a width, or with lower and upper confidence limits bounded by fixed cut-off points, not only increase power-based sample sizes to ethically unacceptable levels (thus making research practically unfeasible) but also greatly increase the costs and burdens of clinical trials. We propose an alternative method of combining the power of a statistical test and the probability of obtaining adequate precision (the power of the confidence interval) with an acceptable increase in power-based sample sizes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 5 21%