↓ Skip to main content

Oropharyngeal exercises in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: our experience

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Breathing, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Oropharyngeal exercises in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: our experience
Published in
Sleep and Breathing, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11325-016-1332-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roshan K. Verma, Jai Richo Johnson J, Manoj Goyal, N. Banumathy, Upendra Goswami, Naresh K. Panda

Abstract

Oropharyngeal exercises are new, non-invasive, cost effective treatment modality for the treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea. It acts by increasing the tone of pharyngeal muscles, is more physiological, and effects are long lasting. The aim of our present study was to evaluate the effect of oropharyngeal exercises in the treatment of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea. Twenty patients of mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) were given oropharyngeal exercise therapy for 3 months divided into three phases in graded level of difficulty. Each exercise had to be repeated 10 times, 5 sets per day at their home. Oropharyngeal exercises were derived from speech-language pathology and included soft palate, tongue, and facial muscle exercises. Anthropometric measurements, snoring frequency, intensity, Epworth daytime sleepiness and Berlin sleep questionnaire, and full polysomnography were performed at baseline and at study conclusion. Body mass index (25.6 ± 3.1) did not change significantly at the end of the study period. There was significant reduction in the neck circumference (38.4 ± 1.3 to 37.8 ± 1.6) at the end of the study. Significant improvement was seen in symptoms of daytime sleepiness, witnessed apnoea, and snoring intensity. Significant improvement was also seen in sleep indices like minimum oxygen saturation, time duration of Sao2 < 90 %, sleep efficiency, arousal index, and total sleep time N3 stage of sleep at the end of study. Graded oropharyngeal exercise therapy increases the compliance and also reduces the severity of mild to moderate OSAS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 151 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 34 22%
Unknown 49 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 51 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,831,656
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#129
of 1,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,508
of 302,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.