↓ Skip to main content

Apixaban: an Oral Direct Factor-Xa Inhibitor

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Therapy, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Apixaban: an Oral Direct Factor-Xa Inhibitor
Published in
Advances in Therapy, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12325-012-0003-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Jiménez, Roger D. Yusen, Eduardo Ramacciotti

Abstract

Apixaban is a highly selective, reversible, direct factor Xa inhibitor that inhibits both free factor Xa and prothrombinase activity, and clot-bound factor Xa activity. A predictable pharmacokinetic profile, multiple pathways of elimination, an improved bleeding profile relative to warfarin with a lack of other significant adverse events, and no need for routine anticoagulation monitoring make apixaban appealing. Apixaban is currently approved for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in total hip replacement and total knee replacement in Europe, Brazil, Australia, and New Zealand, and has been pre-approved in Indonesia and the Philippines. Completed phase 3 trials suggest that apixaban has promise as an alternative to aspirin and warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Results of a large phase 3 trial were the first to show a survival benefit for this new class of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, apixaban added to dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel resulted in unacceptably high rates of major bleeding. In medically ill patients, an extended course of thromboprophylaxis with apixaban was not superior to a shorter course with enoxaparin, and was associated with significantly more major bleeding events than enoxaparin. Ongoing phase 3 trials will provide data regarding the efficacy and safety of apixaban for treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 25 24%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Chemistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#1,623
of 2,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,660
of 156,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.