| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of a Psycho-Educational Intervention Targeting Fear of Cancer Recurrence in People Treated for Early-Stage Melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-019-00483-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mbathio Dieng, Nikita Khanna, Nadine A. Kasparian, Daniel S. J. Costa, Phyllis N. Butow, Scott W. Menzies, Graham J. Mann, Anne E Cust, Rachael L. Morton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 28% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 44% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Psychology | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,152,021
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#80
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,705
of 352,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.