| Title |
Extending Data for Urban Health Decision-Making: a Menu of New and Potential Neighborhood-Level Health Determinants Datasets in LMICs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Urban Health, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11524-019-00363-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dana R. Thomson, Catherine Linard, Sabine Vanhuysse, Jessica E. Steele, Michal Shimoni, José Siri, Waleska Teixeira Caiaffa, Megumi Rosenberg, Eléonore Wolff, Taïs Grippa, Stefanos Georganos, Helen Elsey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 25% |
| United States | 11 | 18% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Macao | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 53% |
| Scientists | 20 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 71 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,000,631
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#172
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,642
of 371,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.