↓ Skip to main content

Estimating primate densities using home range and line transect methods: A comparative test with the black colobus monkeyColobus satanas

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, October 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Estimating primate densities using home range and line transect methods: A comparative test with the black colobus monkeyColobus satanas
Published in
Primates, October 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02557648
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Brugiere, Marie-Claire Fleury

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 5%
United States 4 3%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Student > Master 29 24%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 59%
Environmental Science 20 16%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Unspecified 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 10 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,476,657
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,375
of 37,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.