| Title |
l‐2‐Hydroxyglutaric aciduria, a disorder of metabolite repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, November 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10545-008-1042-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Van Schaftingen, R. Rzem, M. Veiga‐da‐Cunha |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,792,325
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#303
of 1,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,126
of 168,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,870 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.