↓ Skip to main content

Cytotoxic T Cells and their Activation Status are Independent Prognostic Markers in Meningiomas

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytotoxic T Cells and their Activation Status are Independent Prognostic Markers in Meningiomas
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2019
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Rapp, Steffen Dettling, Fang Liu, Anna Theresa Ull, Rolf Warta, Christine Jungk, Saskia Roesch, Andreas Mock, Felix Sahm, Melissa Schmidt, Gerhard Jungwirth, Klaus Zweckberger, Katrin Lamszus, Konstaninos Gousias, Almuth F. Kessler, Niels Grabe, Mario Loehr, Ralf Ketter, Steffi Urbschat, Christian Senft, Manfred Westphal, Amir Abdollahi, Juergen Debus, Andreas von Deimling, Andreas Unterberg, Matthias Simon, Christel C. Herold-Mende

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 39%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,152,619
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#10,332
of 12,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,890
of 340,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#143
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.