↓ Skip to main content

On the evolutionary ecology of symbioses between chemosynthetic bacteria and bivalves

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
On the evolutionary ecology of symbioses between chemosynthetic bacteria and bivalves
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00253-011-3819-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guus Roeselers, Irene L. G. Newton

Abstract

Mutualistic associations between bacteria and eukaryotes occur ubiquitously in nature, forming the basis for key ecological and evolutionary innovations. Some of the most prominent examples of these symbioses are chemosynthetic bacteria and marine invertebrates living in the absence of sunlight at deep-sea hydrothermal vents and in sediments rich in reduced sulfur compounds. Here, chemosynthetic bacteria living in close association with their hosts convert CO(2) or CH(4) into organic compounds and provide the host with necessary nutrients. The dominant macrofauna of hydrothermal vent and cold seep ecosystems all depend on the metabolic activity of chemosynthetic bacteria, which accounts for almost all primary production in these complex ecosystems. Many of these enigmatic mutualistic associations are found within the molluscan class Bivalvia. Currently, chemosynthetic symbioses have been reported from five distinct bivalve families (Lucinidae, Mytilidae, Solemyidae, Thyasiridae, and Vesicomyidae). This brief review aims to provide an overview of the diverse physiological and genetic adaptations of symbiotic chemosynthetic bacteria and their bivalve hosts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 151 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 25%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 19 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 48%
Environmental Science 22 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,253,510
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#201
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,142
of 159,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#4
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.