| Title |
Sex-specific macronutrient foraging strategies in a highly successful marine predator: the Australasian gannet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-016-2841-y |
| Authors |
Gabriel E. Machovsky-Capuska, Alistair M. Senior, Emily C. Benn, Alice H. Tait, Rob Schuckard, Karen A. Stockin, Willie Cook, Mike Ogle, Katherine Barna, David Melville, Belinda Wright, Cameron Purvin, David Raubenheimer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 35% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| Sweden | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,667,939
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#353
of 3,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,788
of 304,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#9
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.