| Title |
Impact of Social Needs Navigation on Utilization Among High Utilizers in a Large Integrated Health System: a Quasi-experimental Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05123-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Schickedanz, Adam Sharp, Yi R. Hu, Nirav R. Shah, John L. Adams, Damon Francis, Artair Rogers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,979,557
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,144
of 8,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,040
of 368,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#64
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.