↓ Skip to main content

Single Context, Metacontext, and High Definition Archaeology: Integrating New Standards of Stratigraphic Excavation and Recording

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Single Context, Metacontext, and High Definition Archaeology: Integrating New Standards of Stratigraphic Excavation and Recording
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10816-019-09417-x
Authors

Sarah Croix, Pieterjan Deckers, Claus Feveile, Maria Knudsen, Sarah Skytte Qvistgaard, Søren M. Sindbæk, Barbora Wouters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 12 36%
Social Sciences 8 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,840,734
of 23,957,285 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#74
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,855
of 356,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,957,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.