↓ Skip to main content

The Biophysical Society of Hong Kong (BPHK): past, present, and future

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
The Biophysical Society of Hong Kong (BPHK): past, present, and future
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12551-019-00525-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guang Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,079,052
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#150
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,527
of 349,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.