↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Loss Aversion under Ambiguity: A Method to Make Prospect Theory Completely Observable

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Measuring Loss Aversion under Ambiguity: A Method to Make Prospect Theory Completely Observable
Published in
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11166-016-9234-y
Authors

Mohammed Abdellaoui, Han Bleichrodt, Olivier L’Haridon, Dennie van Dolder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 26%
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 34 21%
Psychology 23 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 12%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 50 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,181,901
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#169
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,975
of 315,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them