| Title |
Africa’s wooden elephant: the baobab tree (Adansonia digitata L.) in Sudan and Kenya: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10722-015-0360-1 |
| Authors |
Jens Gebauer, Yahia O. Adam, Aida Cuní Sanchez, Dietrich Darr, Muneer E. S. Eltahir, Kamal E. M. Fadl, Gabriele Fernsebner, Michael Frei, Tsige-Yohannes Habte, Karl Hammer, Mauricio Hunsche, Henry Johnson, Maha Kordofani, Michael Krawinkel, Florian Kugler, Eike Luedeling, Tarig E. Mahmoud, Anthony Maina, Dagmar Mithöfer, Chimuleke R. Y. Munthali, Georg Noga, Rabea North, Willis O. Owino, Kathleen Prinz, Freda K. Rimberia, Amina Saied, Martin Schüring, Anne Sennhenn, Martin A. Späth, Mohamed E. N. Taha, Andreas Triebel, Florian Wichern, Martin Wiehle, Nicole Wrage-Mönnig, Katja Kehlenbeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 24% |
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#491,767
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#5
of 729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,487
of 398,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them