| Title |
Mapping the history and current situation of research on John Cunningham virus – a bibliometric analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-9-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hua-chuan Zheng, Lei Yan, Lei Cui, Yi-fu Guan, Yasuo Takano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 29% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,476,657
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,543
of 7,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,052
of 94,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.