You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N.J. Collins, C.A.C. Prinsen, R. Christensen, E.M. Bartels, C.B. Terwee, E.M. Roos |
| Abstract |
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesise evidence regarding measurement properties of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). A comprehensive literature search identified 37 eligible papers evaluating KOOS measurement properties in participants with knee injuries and/or osteoarthritis. Methodological quality was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Where possible, meta-analysis of extracted data was conducted for all studies and stratified by age and knee condition; otherwise narrative synthesis was performed. KOOS has adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity in young and old adults with knee injuries and/or osteoarthritis. The ADL subscale has better content validity for older patients and Sport/Rec for younger patients with knee injuries, while the Pain subscale is more relevant for painful knee conditions. The five-factor structure of the original KOOS is unclear. There is some evidence that the KOOS subscales demonstrate sufficient unidimensionality, but this requires confirmation. Although measurement error requires further evaluation, the minimal detectable change for KOOS subscales ranges from 14.3 to 19.6 for younger individuals, and ≥20 for older individuals. Evidence of responsiveness comes from larger effect sizes following surgical (especially total knee replacement) than non-surgical interventions. KOOS demonstrates adequate content validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness for age- and condition-relevant subscales. Structural validity, cross-cultural validity and measurement error require further evaluation, as well as construct validity of KOOS-PS. Suggested order of subscales for different knee conditions can be applied in hierarchical testing of endpoints in clinical trials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 10 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 16% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 51% |
| Scientists | 24 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 751 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 749 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 114 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 8% |
| Researcher | 58 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 6% |
| Other | 118 | 16% |
| Unknown | 265 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 187 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 146 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 37 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 53 | 7% |
| Unknown | 307 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,066,141
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#118
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,298
of 313,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#2
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.