You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Hypermutant Glioblastoma Multiforme Resulting From Germline Biallelic Mismatch Repair Deficiency
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2016.66.6552 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Bouffet, Valérie Larouche, Brittany B Campbell, Daniele Merico, Richard de Borja, Melyssa Aronson, Carol Durno, Joerg Krueger, Vanja Cabric, Vijay Ramaswamy, Nataliya Zhukova, Gary Mason, Roula Farah, Samina Afzal, Michal Yalon, Gideon Rechavi, Vanan Magimairajan, Michael F Walsh, Shlomi Constantini, Rina Dvir, Ronit Elhasid, Alyssa Reddy, Michael Osborn, Michael Sullivan, Jordan Hansford, Andrew Dodgshun, Nancy Klauber-Demore, Lindsay Peterson, Sunil Patel, Scott Lindhorst, Jeffrey Atkinson, Zane Cohen, Rachel Laframboise, Peter Dirks, Michael Taylor, David Malkin, Steffen Albrecht, Roy W R Dudley, Nada Jabado, Cynthia E Hawkins, Adam Shlien, Uri Tabori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 42% |
| France | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 74% |
| Scientists | 16 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 440 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 15% |
| Other | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 94 | 21% |
| Unknown | 102 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 64 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 9% |
| Unknown | 123 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#463,928
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#933
of 22,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,324
of 314,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#23
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.