| Title |
Banning paraphylies and executing Linnaean taxonomy is discordant and reduces the evolutionary and semantic information content of biological nomenclature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insectes Sociaux, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00040-016-0467-1 |
| Authors |
B. Seifert, A. Buschinger, A. Aldawood, V. Antonova, H. Bharti, L. Borowiec, W. Dekoninck, D. Dubovikoff, X. Espadaler, J. Flegr, C. Georgiadis, J. Heinze, R. Neumeyer, F. Ødegaard, J. Oettler, A. Radchenko, R. Schultz, M. Sharaf, J. Trager, A. Vesnić, M. Wiezik, H. Zettel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,494,551
of 24,541,341 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#70
of 1,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,639
of 305,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,541,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.